NLRB Changes Standard for Offensive Comments Made in the Course of Protected Activity

Last month, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a new standard which gives employers more flexibility to discipline – and terminate – employees for abusive language used while otherwise engaging in protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

Prior to the new standard announced in In re: General Motors, LLC and Charles Robinson, 14-CA-197985 and 14-CA-208242, the NLRB permitted employees to engage in obscene, racist and sexually harassing speech, if such speech was made while engaged in protected concerted activity. As a result, employers were forced to keep employees on staff even though their behavior may have run afoul of antidiscrimination laws and acceptable workplace conduct standards.

Under the new standard, if the NLRB is able to prove that the motivating factor for the disciplinary action at issue was the employee’s protected concerted activity, the employer can avoid liability if it can prove that it would have taken the same action if the employee was not engaged in the protected concerted activity. An employer can prove this by showing, for instance, prior consistent discipline for the same kind of obscene, racist or sexually harassing speech.

Contact info:
Meredith S. Campbell Chair, Employment and Labor Group
Shulman Rogers mcampbell@shulmanrogers.com | T 301.255.0550 | F 301.230.2891


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *